AlgoBulls logo

Contact Us

Long Iron Condor Strategy: Defined Risk for Volatile Market Scenarios

/img/blogs/blog_longIron/thumbnail

Introduction

Expecting volatility but unsure about the direction? The Long Iron Condor strategy is designed for breakout market conditions, allowing traders to capitalie on significant price movements while maintaining limited risk.

In this blog, we’ll break down how it works, discuss entry and exit strategies, explore risk management techniques, and demonstrate ways to adapt it to different market conditions.

Understanding the Long Iron Condor Strategy

The Long Iron Condor is a four-legged options strategy that targets large price swings in either direction, offering a way to trade expected volatility expansion with limited risk. It consists of:

  • Buy an Out-of-the-Money (OTM) Call Option

  • Sell a Higher Strike (further OTM) Call Option

  • Buy an OTM Put Option

  • Sell a Lower Strike (further OTM) Put Option

All options have the same expiration date, creating a low-cost, high-reward trade that benefits when the underlying asset moves sharply in either direction.

An Iron Condor can be used in two ways:

  • Short Iron Condor – A market-neutral strategy that profits from low volatility and range-bound conditions.

  • Long Iron Condor – A volatility-driven approach that maintains limited risk while remaining responsive to directional breakouts.

The Long Iron Condor works best during high-impact events likely to spark movement—such as earnings announcements, interest rate decisions, or technical breakouts. These scenarios often precede strong price shifts, aligning with the strategy’s goal of capturing expansion while capping risk.

Unlike straddles or strangles, it achieves this with a defined-risk structure, combining low cost with strong profit potential.

How the Long Iron Condor Strategy Works

1. Entry Criteria

Eligible Markets: The strategy is best suited for highly liquid options markets where large price movements are likely. This includes:

• Indices: NSE’s NIFTY 50, BANK NIFTY, and US-based S&P 500 (SPY), Nasdaq 100 (QQQ)

• Stocks: Large-cap stocks with high volatility, such as RIL, TATA MOTORS, AAPL, MSFT.

Strike Price Selection: As previously outlined, this strategy consists of two spreads: a Bull Call Spread and a Bear Put Spread. Strike widths can be adjusted based on cost and risk preferences.

  • Narrower Strikes: Lower cost but requires a stronger move to become profitable.
  • Wider Strikes: Higher cost but provides greater profit potential if a strong breakout occurs.

Expiry Selection:

  • Weekly Expiry: Preferred for fast, volatile moves with quicker profit realisation.
  • Monthly Expiry: Provides more time for the expected breakout, reducing the risk of false signals.

Lot Size & Positioning:

  • Position sizing is determined by risk appetite and expected volatility.
  • Traders must ensure that they define max risk before placing trades.

Timeframes: The strategy works across 1–60 minute intervals, but a 1-minute timeframe is ideal for precise monitoring and timely execution.

2. Exit Rules & Re-Entry Strategy

The strategy exits when:

  • Price Levels have Breached – the underlying price breaches a predefined threshold from the entry level. These thresholds — called offsets — are configured separately for upward and downward movement.

Re-Entry Conditions

  • Re-entry is allowed if the price subsequently reverses and crosses the opposite offset level, indicating momentum continuation. New strikes are selected around the current price at re-entry.
  • This logic ensures that the system doesn’t just exit at a breakout but also adapts to volatility by re-engaging if a larger trend develops.

  • For full details on how this is implemented dynamically, refer to the upcoming code section

Alternative Exit Strategies

  • Partial Profit Booking – If one side of the trade reaches profit while the other remains active, traders can close profitable legs while keeping the other open.

  • Time-Based Exit – Instead of waiting for price movement, traders may exit after a certain percentage of the expiry period has passed.

Long Iron Condor Strategy Execution Flowchart

Figure 1: Long Iron Condor Strategy Execution Flowchart

(Values align with the first sample in the upcoming Profit & Loss Calculations section).

This section covers the python implementation of a Long Iron Condor with defined strike distances and automated re-entry.

Selecting Instruments and Strikes for Entry

def strategy_select_instruments_for_entry(self, candle, instruments_bucket):
        selected_instruments, meta, executed_tradingsymbol_suffix = [], [], set()

        for base_instrument in instruments_bucket:
            self.logger.info(
                f"Checking entry/re-entry conditions for base instrument: {base_instrument} | "
                f"Determining OTM option instruments and verifying if CE/PE orders are already placed."
            )
            # Define a list of tuples for managing legs, their types, and relevant orders
            leg_wise_list = [
                ("ce_buy_leg", 'CE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_ce_leg, 'BUY', self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce[base_instrument].get("ce_buy_leg") if self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce.get(base_instrument) else None),
                ("ce_sell_leg", 'CE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_ce_leg, 'SELL', self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce[base_instrument].get("ce_sell_leg") if self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce.get(base_instrument) else None),
                ("pe_buy_leg", 'PE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_pe_leg, 'BUY', self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe[base_instrument].get("pe_buy_leg") if self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe.get(base_instrument) else None),
                ("pe_sell_leg", 'PE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_pe_leg, 'SELL', self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe[base_instrument].get("pe_sell_leg") if self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe.get(base_instrument) else None)
            ]

            current_underlying_price = self.broker.get_ltp(base_instrument)

            # Calculate re-entry conditions based on the latest price
            flag_upper_re_entry = (self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry and (self.base_price_post_breach - current_underlying_price) >= self.price_breach_upper_offset)
            flag_lower_re_entry = (self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry and (current_underlying_price - self.base_price_post_breach) >= self.price_breach_lower_offset)

            # Check if there are no active orders (PE/CE legs), re-entry check has been triggered
            flag_empty_orders = (not self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe and not self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce)
            flag_re_entry_triggered = (self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry or self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry)

            # Proceed only if no open orders or if the re-entry conditions are met with existing orders
            if flag_empty_orders and (flag_upper_re_entry or flag_lower_re_entry or not flag_re_entry_triggered):
                for leg, tradingsymbol_suffix, no_of_strikes, action, main_order in leg_wise_list:
                    if tradingsymbol_suffix not in executed_tradingsymbol_suffix:
                        self.options_instruments_set_up_all_expiries(base_instrument, tradingsymbol_suffix, current_underlying_price)
                        executed_tradingsymbol_suffix.add(tradingsymbol_suffix)

                    child_instrument = self.get_child_instrument_details(base_instrument, tradingsymbol_suffix, OptionsStrikeDirection.OTM.value, no_of_strikes)  # Retrieve OTM child base_instrument details for the given base_instrument
                    self.instruments_mapper.add_mappings(base_instrument, child_instrument)  # Maps each base_instrument to its child in the instruments' mapper for further processing.
                    selected_instruments.append(child_instrument)
                    meta.append({"leg": leg, "action": action, "base_instrument": base_instrument, "tradingsymbol_suffix": tradingsymbol_suffix})

            if flag_re_entry_triggered:
                self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry = self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry = False  # Resets upper and lower price breach conditions after re-entry is triggered and acted upon

        return selected_instruments, meta

Code Explanation:

1. Instrument and Order Leg Setup:

leg_wise_list = [
    ("ce_buy_leg", 'CE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_ce_leg, 'BUY', ...),
    ("ce_sell_leg", 'CE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_ce_leg, 'SELL', ...),
    ("pe_buy_leg", 'PE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_pe_leg, 'BUY', ...),
    ("pe_sell_leg", 'PE', self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_pe_leg, 'SELL', ...)
]
  • Defines a unified structure for all four option legs (buy/sell CE and PE), which simplifies logic reuse and leg-wise iteration. Each entry holds:

    • The internal leg label (ce_buy_leg, etc.)

    • Option type ('CE' or 'PE')

    • Configured number of strikes OTM (self.no_of_otm_strikes*)

    • Action ('BUY' or 'SELL')

    • Existing order, if any, for that leg

  • This structure allows the logic to process all option legs uniformly in a loop.

2. Re-entry Condition Flags:

flag_upper_re_entry = (...)

flag_lower_re_entry = (...)
  • These flags determine if the current price has sufficiently moved back in the opposite direction of a prior breach, thereby justifying a re-entry.

    • If price falls after an upper breach, or rises after a lower breach, it triggers possible re-entry.

    • Re-entry is only considered when a post-breach base price is established

3. Conditions for Initiating Trades:

flag_empty_orders = (not self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe and not self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce)
flag_re_entry_triggered = (self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry or self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry)
  • flag_empty_orders ensures the system isn’t already holding any PE or CE leg orders — prevents duplicate entry.

  • flag_re_entry_triggered checks if re-entry logic has been activated (from prior price action breaches).

4. Entry Eligibility Logic:

if flag_empty_orders and (flag_upper_re_entry or flag_lower_re_entry or not flag_re_entry_triggered):
  • Ensures no ongoing position exists

  • Allows fresh entry if:

    • Either upper or lower re-entry thresholds are hit (i.e., price returns to “neutral” zone)

    • Or if this is the initial entry (no breach yet)

  • This condition prevents duplicate re-entries and ensures the strategy respects its defined entry criteria.

5. Tradingsymbol Suffix Execution Control:

if tradingsymbol_suffix not in executed_tradingsymbol_suffix:
    self.options_instruments_set_up_all_expiries(...)
    executed_tradingsymbol_suffix.add(tradingsymbol_suffix)
  • Ensures options setup for a given ‘CE’ or ‘PE’ suffix is done only once — triggered when the suffix first appears in any leg — avoiding redundant setup for subsequent ones.

6. Post-Reentry Cleanup:

if flag_re_entry_triggered:
    self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry = self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry = False
  • Resets the breach flags after acting upon them — critical to prevent repeated triggers of the same re-entry condition in future candles.

Creating an Order for a Position

def strategy_enter_position(self, candle, instrument, meta):

        child_instrument = instrument
        base_instrument = self.instruments_mapper.get_base_instrument(child_instrument)
        self.base_price_post_breach = self.broker.get_ltp(base_instrument)  # Initialises base reference price with trade entry price; updated only after breach.
        if meta['action'] == 'BUY':
            _order = self.broker.BuyOrderRegular(instrument=child_instrument, order_code=self.order_code, order_variety=BrokerOrderVarietyConstants.MARKET, quantity=self.number_of_lots * child_instrument.lot_size)
        else:
            _order = self.broker.SellOrderRegular(instrument=child_instrument, order_code=self.order_code, order_variety=BrokerOrderVarietyConstants.MARKET, quantity=self.number_of_lots * child_instrument.lot_size)

        if check_order_placed_successfully(_order):
            if meta["tradingsymbol_suffix"] == "CE":
                self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce.setdefault(meta['base_instrument'], {})[meta['leg']] = _order
            else:
                self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe.setdefault(meta['base_instrument'], {})[meta['leg']] = _order
        else:
            # Protection logic in case any of the legs fail to get placed - this will help avoid having naked positions
            self.logger.critical('Order placement failed for one of the legs. Exiting position for other legs, if possible and stopping strategy.')
            self.exit_all_positions_for_base_instrument(base_instrument)
            raise ABSystemExit

        return _order

Code Explanation:

1. Base Price Initialisation for Post-Breach Logic:

self.base_price_post_breach = self.broker.get_ltp(base_instrument)
  • Captures the LTP (Last Traded Price) of the base instrument at the moment a position is entered.

  • This price serves as the reference point to detect future breaches for re-entry logic.

  • It gets updated only at the point of entry, and not dynamically, ensuring consistent breach evaluation.

2. Market Order Placement Logic:

if meta['action'] == 'BUY':
    _order = self.broker.BuyOrderRegular(...)
else:
    _order = self.broker.SellOrderRegular(...)
  • Places a market order based on the specified action from the meta dictionary.

    • meta["action"] is either 'BUY' or 'SELL'

    • child_instrument refers to the specific CE/PE leg being executed

    • Order quantity is dynamically calculated based on the number of lots and instrument’s lot size.

  • This ensures uniform order placement logic for all legs (CE/PE, BUY/SELL).

3. Order Success Handling and Leg Registration:

if check_order_placed_successfully(_order):
    if meta["tradingsymbol_suffix"] == "CE":
        self.child_instrument_main_orders_ce.setdefault(...)[...] = _order
    else:
        self.child_instrument_main_orders_pe.setdefault(...)[...] = _order
  • If the order is successfully placed:

    • Registers the order under the appropriate tracking structure (main_orders_ce or main_orders_pe)

    • Organises orders by base instrument and leg name (e.g., 'ce_buy_leg', 'pe_sell_leg')

  • This mapping is essential for later tracking, exits, and strategy adjustments.

4. Order Failure Contingency Handling:

else:
    self.logger.critical(...)
    self.exit_all_positions_for_base_instrument(base_instrument)
    raise ABSystemExit
  • If any leg fails to execute, the strategy:

    • Logs the critical failure

    • Immediately exits all positions for the same base instrument to avoid naked or partial exposures

    • Raises a custom system exit exception (ABSystemExit) to halt further strategy execution

  • This is a critical risk control mechanism to prevent directional exposure when only part of a multi-leg strategy is executed.

Exit Strategy: Understanding Price Breach

def check_exit_condition(self, base_instrument):
        """ Determines if the strategy should exit based on price breach conditions. Returns True if exit condition is met. """

        current_underlying_price = self.broker.get_ltp(base_instrument)
        self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry = current_underlying_price - self.base_price_post_breach >= self.price_breach_upper_offset if self.price_breach_upper_offset else False
        self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry = self.base_price_post_breach - current_underlying_price >= self.price_breach_lower_offset if self.price_breach_lower_offset else False

        if self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry or self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry:
            breach_type_str = 'Upper' if self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry else 'Lower'
            self.logger.info(f'{breach_type_str} price thresholds breached. Exiting current positions for all legs. Checking re-entry condition in next candle.')
            self.base_price_post_breach = current_underlying_price  # Current ltp becomes new base reference price in case of breach
            return True

        return False

Code Explanation:

1. Fetching Current Market Price:

current_underlying_price = self.broker.get_ltp(base_instrument)
  • Retrieves the live market price of the given base instrument, which will be compared against the previously recorded trade-entry price (self.base_price_post_breach) to check for significant movement in either direction.

2. Breach Flag Evaluation:


self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry = current_underlying_price - self.base_price_post_breach >= self.price_breach_upper_offset if self.price_breach_upper_offset else False
self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry = self.base_price_post_breach - current_underlying_price >= self.price_breach_lower_offset if self.price_breach_lower_offset else False
  • These flags detect if the current price has moved significantly from the entry-level price to warrant an exit and potential re-entry:

    • flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry is triggered if price has moved above the entry point by a configured threshold (price_breach_upper_offset)

    • flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry is triggered if price has moved below the entry point by the respective threshold (price_breach_lower_offset)

  • Both conditions are guarded with if self.price_breach_*_offset to ensure they’re only evaluated when thresholds are explicitly configured.

3. Logging and Exit Trigger:

if self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry or self.flag_lower_breach_possible_reentry:
    breach_type_str = 'Upper' if self.flag_upper_breach_possible_reentry else 'Lower'
    self.logger.info(f'{breach_type_str} price thresholds breached. Exiting current positions for all legs. Checking re-entry condition in next candle.')
    self.base_price_post_breach = current_underlying_price
    return True
  • If either breach flag is raised:

    • A log entry is created indicating which side (upper or lower) was breached

    • The system updates the base price to the current price to track future re-entry conditions from a fresh reference point

    • Returns True, indicating to the strategy that an exit condition is met and active positions should be closed

4. Default Behavior (No Exit):

return False
  • If no breach is detected, the strategy does not take any action, and the method returns False, indicating that the existing positions should continue to be held.

Validation in Long Iron Condor

def validate_parameters(self):

        # Validate expiry dates
        if len(self.get_allowed_expiry_dates()) != self.number_of_allowed_expiry_dates:
            self.logger.info(f"Allowed expiry dates: {self.number_of_allowed_expiry_dates}, got {len(self.get_allowed_expiry_dates())}. Exiting...")
            raise SystemExit

        # Validate parameters
        for param in (self.price_breach_upper_offset, self.price_breach_lower_offset):
            check_argument(param, "extern_function", is_nonnegative_int_or_float, "Value should be >=0.0")

        for param in (self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_ce_leg, self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_ce_leg, self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_pe_leg, self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_pe_leg):
            check_argument(param, 'extern_function', is_positive_int, 'Number of strikes should be an integer > 0')

        for param in [self.strategy_parameters.get("ALLOW_REENTRY_UPPER", 0), self.strategy_parameters.get("ALLOW_REENTRY_LOWER", 0)]:
            check_argument(param, 'extern_function', lambda x: isinstance(x, int) and x in [0, 1], f'ALLOW_REENTRY parameters should be 0 (False) or 1 (True)')

Code Explanation:

1. Handling Expiry Mismatches to Prevent Empty or Invalid Positions

Why It Matters:

Options strategies depend heavily on accurate and timely expiry information. If the expiry dates fetched from the broker don’t match the expected count, it could indicate:

  • A broker-side data issue (e.g., delayed API response)

  • Trading on a holiday or invalid instrument setup. In such cases, continuing with the strategy could lead to orders being rejected or incomplete trade setups.

Validation Control:

if len(self.get_allowed_expiry_dates()) != self.number_of_allowed_expiry_dates:
    self.logger.info(f"Allowed expiry dates: {self.number_of_allowed_expiry_dates}, got {len(self.get_allowed_expiry_dates())}. Exiting...")
    raise SystemExit
  • Prevents order placement when expiry data is missing or inconsistent, avoiding capital lock-up or order failure.

2. Preventing Illogical Breach Thresholds

Why It Matters:

The price_breach_upper_offset and price_breach_lower_offset control when the strategy considers an exit due to adverse movement.

Negative or missing values could:

  • Trigger premature exits

  • Never trigger breaches at all\

Either case undermines risk control and trade logic.

Validation Control:

for param in (self.price_breach_upper_offset, self.price_breach_lower_offset):
    check_argument(param, "extern_function", is_nonnegative_int_or_float, "Value should be >=0.0")
  • Ensures exit triggers are realistic and non-negative, preserving consistent breach logic.

3. Ensuring Strike Distance Parameters Are Set Correctly

Why It Matters:

For multi-leg option strategies (like strangles or condors), each leg needs a specified number of strikes OTM from ATM.

Incorrect or zero strike values may lead to:

  • ATM positions instead of OTM

  • Excessive premium or insufficient breakeven coverage\

This risks converting the strategy into a directionally exposed position or a misaligned hedge.

Validation Control:

for param in (self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_ce_leg, self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_ce_leg,
              self.no_of_otm_strikes_buy_pe_leg, self.no_of_otm_strikes_sell_pe_leg):
    check_argument(param, 'extern_function', is_positive_int, 'Number of strikes should be an integer > 0')
  • Guarantees correct leg separation across CE and PE sides — avoiding strategy misfire or overexposure.

4. Validating Re-entry Control Flags

Why It Matters:

Re-entry behavior (after a breach-triggered exit) must be explicitly controlled using flags like ALLOW_REENTRY_UPPER and ALLOW_REENTRY_LOWER.

If these values are not binary (0 or 1), it could:

  • Allow unintentional re-entry when risk isn’t mitigated

  • Completely block re-entry, undermining profitability

Validation Control:

for param in [self.strategy_parameters.get("ALLOW_REENTRY_UPPER", 0),
              self.strategy_parameters.get("ALLOW_REENTRY_LOWER", 0)]:
    check_argument(param, 'extern_function', lambda x: isinstance(x, int) and x in [0, 1], f'ALLOW_REENTRY parameters should be 0 (False) or 1 (True)')
  • Ensures deterministic re-entry logic and avoids unpredictable trade cycling during volatile periods.

💡 Want to see the complete strategy? Check out the full implementation here.

Comparing Long Iron Condor and Short Call Condor Strategies

Both Long Iron Condors and Short Call Condors are breakout strategies that profit from a significant move beyond a defined price range. Despite their different constructions, they share similar characteristics and objectives. However, the differences in option structure, margin requirements, and trade execution can make one preferable over the other in specific market conditions.

Structural Differences

Feature Long Iron Condor Short Call Condor
Option Types Used 2 Calls + 2 Puts (Bull Call Spread + Bear Put Spread) 4 Calls (Sell low, Buy mid, Buy mid, Sell high)
Initial Trade Type Debit (Net premium paid) Credit (Net premium received)
Max Profit Scenario Price moves beyond highest call strike or below lowest put strike Price moves beyond highest strike or below lowest strike
Max Loss Scenario Price stays between the two middle strikes Price stays between the two middle strikes
Margin Requirements Lower due to balanced call/put hedging Can be higher due to all-call construction
Implied Volatility Impact Long Vega (Profits from rising IV) Long Vega (Profits from rising IV)

The mind tree diagram below provides a visual summary for quickly determining the appropriate strategy based on volatility expectations and trader preferences.

Long Iron Condor vs. Short Call Condor Mind Tree

Figure 2: Long Iron Condor vs. Short Call Condor Mind Tree

Which One is Right for You?

  • If you expect increased volatility and prefer a lower-risk trade, the Long Iron Condor is the safer choice.
  • If you want to collect premium upfront and can handle higher margin and early assignment risk, the Short Call Condor may be preferable.

Refer to the Structural Differences Table above for a quick comparison of trade mechanics and risk considerations.

Interpreting the Long Iron Condor Payoff Structure

The following payoff diagram illustrates the profit and loss dynamics of a low-risk long iron condor strategy. The values used correspond to those depicted in the flowchart.

Profit and Loss Diagram

Figure 3: Profit and Loss Diagram

The green lines represent potential profits. Unlike some other strategies, the green lines extend infinitely outside the breakeven points, because as the underlying price moves further away from the middle strike prices, the long options (protective legs) continue to gain value.

The red lines indicate potential losses, which are capped within a specific range between the lower and upper breakeven points. The maximum loss occurs when the underlying price is within this range but outside the middle strike prices, where the sold options are exercised against the trader, and the protective options have not yet gained sufficient value to offset the losses.

Dashed lines highlight key levels:

  • Breakeven points: Where the profit/loss curve crosses zero. Beyond these points, the strategy turns profitable due to the unlimited potential of the long options.
  • Maximum profit: Achieved when the underlying price moves significantly above the upper breakeven point or below the lower breakeven point.
  • Maximum loss: Incurred when the underlying price is within the range of the two sold strikes but outside the breakeven points.

By carefully selecting strike prices and monitoring breakeven points, this strategy aims to profit from significant price movement in either direction. Losses are limited by design, making this strategy appealing to risk-averse traders expecting volatility.

Now, let’s break down profit and loss calculations for the different scenarios.

Profit & Loss Calculations

Low-Risk Long Iron Condor

The previous diagram sets the stage for the low-risk variation of the Long Iron Condor strategy.

Key Parameters

  • Instrument: SPY (S&P 500 ETF)
  • Expiration Type: Nearest Monthly Expiry
  • Strike Selection:
    • Leg One: 1 strike away from ATM (OTM Call Buy)
    • Leg Two: 3 strikes away from ATM (OTM Call Sell)
    • Leg Three: 1 strike away from ATM (OTM Put Buy)
    • Leg Four: 3 strikes away from ATM (OTM Put Sell)
  • Offset for Price Breach:
    • Lower Offset: $14
    • Upper Offset: $14

Calculations:

  • Total Premium Paid:

Total Premium Paid = Net Premium Paid = $4

  • Maximum Profit Calculation:

Maximum Profit = Strike Difference - Net Premium Paid = $10 - $4 = $6

Occurs when the underlying asset’s price is below $580 or above $620 at expiration.

  • Maximum Loss Calculation:

Maximum Loss = Net Premium Paid = $4

Occurs when the underlying asset’s price is between the short strikes ($590 to $610).

  • Breakeven Points:

    • Lower Breakeven: Lower BE = Lower Put Strike + Net Premium Paid = $580 + $6 = $586

    • Upper Breakeven: Upper BE = Upper Call Strike - Net Premium Paid = $620 - $6 = $614

P&L Outcomes:

Underlying Spot Price P&L Without Re-entry P&L With Re-entry
$570 +$6 (Maximum Profit) +$6 (Maximum Profit)
$586 (Lower Breakeven) 0 0
$590 to $610 (Short Strikes Range) -$4 (Maximum Loss) Re-entry Initiated
$614 (Upper Breakeven) 0 0
$630 +$6 (Maximum Profit) +$6 (Maximum Profit)

High-Risk Long Iron Condor

The diagram below illustrates the profit and loss structure for the high-risk variation of the long iron condor strategy:

Profit and Loss Diagram : High Risk Version

Figure 4: Profit and Loss Diagram : High Risk Version

Key Parameters

  • Instrument: RIL (Reliance Industries Ltd)
  • Expiration Type: Nearest Monthly Expiry
  • Strike Selection:
    • Leg One: 1 strike away from ATM (OTM Call Buy)
    • Leg Two: 3 strikes away from ATM (OTM Call Sell)
    • Leg Three: 1 strike away from ATM (OTM Put Buy)
    • Leg Four: 3 strikes away from ATM (OTM Put Sell)
  • Offset for Price Breach:
    • Lower Offset: ₹60
    • Upper Offset: ₹60

Calculations

  • Total Premium Paid:

Total Premium Paid = Net Premium Paid = ₹6

  • Maximum Profit Calculation:

Maximum Profit = Strike Difference - Net Premium Paid = ₹50 - ₹6 = ₹14

Occurs when the underlying asset’s price is below ₹1150 or above ₹1250 at expiration.

  • Maximum Loss Calculation:

Maximum Loss = Net Premium Paid = ₹6

Occurs when the underlying asset’s price is between the short strikes (₹1170 to ₹1230).

  • Breakeven Points:

    • Lower Breakeven: Lower BE = Lower Put Strike + Net Premium Paid = ₹1150 + ₹14 = ₹1164

    • Upper Breakeven: Upper BE = Upper Call Strike - Net Premium Paid = ₹1250 - ₹14 = ₹1236

P&L Outcomes

Underlying Spot Price P&L Without Re-entry P&L With Re-entry
₹1150 or below +₹14 (Maximum Profit) +₹14 (Maximum Profit)
₹1164 (Lower Breakeven) 0 0
₹1170 to ₹1230 (Short Strikes Range) -₹6 (Maximum Loss) Re-entry Initiated
₹1236 (Upper Breakeven) 0 0
₹1250 or above +₹14 (Maximum Profit) +₹14 (Maximum Profit)

A Low-Risk Long Iron Condor Strategy offers smaller but steadier profits, with a reduced probability of reaching the maximum loss. On the other hand, a High-Risk Long Iron Condor Strategy targets higher potential returns by capturing more premium, but it carries a greater likelihood of loss if the underlying asset moves significantly beyond the break-even points. Lets understand this in better detail with the help of a diagram.

Comparison of Low-Risk and High-Risk Long Iron Condor Strategies

Probability of Profit (POP) Calculation

The Probability of Profit (POP) is the likelihood of the underlying price moving outside the breakeven points, where the strategy becomes profitable. The calculation is based on the area under the Probability Density Function (PDF) curves outside the breakeven points.

  • SPY Strategy (Low Risk): The narrow break-even range caused by lower volatility results in a smaller probability of profit, calculated to be approximately 37%.
  • RIL Strategy (High Risk): The broader break-even range resulting from higher volatility allows for a greater probability of profit, calculated to be approximately 53%.

The diagram below visually represents the POP for each strategy:

  • SPY (Low Risk): Represented by the blue curve, which is narrower and more peaked due to lower volatility.
  • RIL (High Risk): Represented by the red curve, which is broader and flatter due to higher volatility.
Comparing Profit Probability for Low and High-Risk Long Iron Condor

Figure 5: Comparing Profit Probability for Low and High-Risk Long Iron Condor Strategies

Customise the Long Iron Condor Strategy with Your Own Parameters!

The Long Iron Condor is a flexible strategy that can be tailored to your risk tolerance, market outlook, and profit objectives. By adjusting strike widths, expiry choices, re-entry mechanisms, and premium targets, traders can adapt this strategy to various market conditions.

📬 Contact us to explore more!

👉 For testing on the Phoenix platform of AlgoBulls, head over to our site now!

👉 A Jupyter notebook for this strategy is coming soon. Meanwhile, check out All Available Notebooks for Testing Custom Strategies!

Final Thoughts

The Long Iron Condor is not a one-size-fits-all approach—but that’s where its power lies. It offers a structured, risk-defined framework that can be adapted through dynamic adjustments: refining re-entries, rolling strikes, extending expiries, or refining entry conditions. Whether you prioritise higher potential returns or a higher probability of success, this strategy balances risk and reward with clarity and control.

Advanced Risk Management for Long Iron Condor

The Long Iron Condor is inherently a risk-defined strategy, but traders can further enhance its performance by applying strategic adjustments to reduce risk and improve consistency. Unlike simple directional plays, the Long Iron Condor allows for modifications without compromising its core principle of limited risk.

  1. Rolling Strikes (Dynamic Adjustment):

    • Purpose: Optimise profitability and mitigate risk by adjusting strike prices throughout the trade.

    • Effect: Adapts to market conditions by shifting strikes to capture premium or reduce risk.

    • Use Case: Effective when the underlying asset moves significantly or volatility changes, enhancing profitability without closing the position.

  2. Rolling Positions (Adjusting Expiry):

    • Purpose: Provide more time for the strategy to become profitable after an initial move.

    • Effect: Extending expiry allows continued participation in ongoing trends, reduces the impact of short-term pullbacks, and avoids forced exits before the move completes.

    • Use Case: Useful when price approaches breakeven but needs more time to extend, especially in event-driven or trending markets where volatility persists beyond the original timeframe.

  3. Target Profit Mechanism

    • Purpose: Lock in gains once a predefined profit threshold is achieved, preventing trades from reversing into losses after being in profit.

    • Effect: Exits active positions automatically when cumulative P&L crosses a set percentage (e.g., 30% of deployed premium or margin). This helps enforce discipline and avoids giving back profits in fast-moving markets.

    • Use Case: Highly effective in volatile environments where sharp moves can quickly generate profits — but may also reverse just as fast. By capturing gains early, traders avoid getting caught in retracements or post-breakout whipsaws. Also useful in event-driven scenarios (e.g., earnings, Fed announcements), where initial moves may be followed by fading momentum.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. The views and opinions expressed are based on the interpretation by the author of this article 'Long Iron Condor Strategy: Defined Risk for Volatile Market Scenarios'. While we strive for accuracy, readers are advised to consult with regulatory authorities, financial experts, or legal professionals before making any trading or investment decisions. AlgoBulls is not responsible for any direct or indirect implications arising from the use of this information.